Deciding whether to get better at things we could be better at or become really good at what we already do well is always a big question. Some people say it's crucial to fix our weak points to be good, while others argue that becoming a master in what we're already good at is the key. The best choice depends on what each person wants, the situation, and what they like.
On one hand, some people say it's good to work on things you're not so great at. They think having a mix of skills is essential, especially in different situations. If you get better at something you're not so good at, you become more capable overall. And getting better at something you're not confident about can boost your self-belief. This way, you keep learning and getting stronger. So, some people believe that tackling your weaknesses is a way to become more skilled, confident, and ready for anything.
On the other hand, focusing on what you're already good at has its perks. It's like becoming a pro in something specific. When you master your strengths, you stand out and perform exceptionally well. People notice, and it gives you a competitive edge. Moreover, doing what you're great at can be super fulfilling. It's like doing something you love, which keeps you motivated and helps you achieve even more. So, sometimes, putting your energy into perfecting your strengths can lead to significant achievements and satisfaction.
Ultimately, a balanced approach may be the most prudent. Instead of focusing on what you're not great at or only on what you're already excellent at, it's about doing both. This way, you build a set of skills that covers a lot of ground, using what you're good at and improving what needs work.
